Decide whether you want fundamentals or a tool
A course on how transformers work and a course on how to prompt a particular assistant are both legitimate and almost unrelated. Fundamentals stay useful when products change and cost more effort up front. Tool training is immediately applicable and has a shorter shelf life. Neither is a substitute, and the biggest source of disappointment in this subject is buying one while wanting the other.
Ask how old the material is, and whether that matters
This is the fastest-moving subject in the catalogue. A course recorded two years ago may still be excellent on backpropagation and useless on which model to use. Where a provider publishes a last-updated date we record it, and the summary usually says whether the course is taught around a specific product or around concepts that outlive it.
Notice whose tools it teaches
Much of the best AI training is published by the companies that make the models and libraries, and it is often genuinely the primary source. It is also, by construction, about their ecosystem. That is not a reason to avoid it, but it is worth knowing whether you are learning a field or a product. Each listing names the publisher, and where a course is built around one vendor the summary says so.
Check the mathematics and programming assumed
Courses in this subject range from requiring no technical background at all to assuming linear algebra, calculus and a year of Python. Providers usually state prerequisites plainly, and they mean them. The level on each listing reflects what the provider states.
Be sceptical of transformation claims
AI attracts marketing about replacing work, multiplying output and career transformation. Treat those as claims about the future rather than descriptions of the course. What a course can honestly offer is that you will understand something or be able to do something specific, which is the part worth reading closely.